Sunday, April 8, 2012

The Dark Tower: A Suggested Reading Order for the (Extended) Series

The Wind Through the Keyhole is a mere two weeks away, and with it I'm sure there will come a renewed interest in the overall Dark Tower series.

Prompted partly by that, and partly by a conversation I had on Facebook, I decided to take a stab at creating a Suggested-By-Honk-Mahfah list of what order the Dark Tower books ought to be read in.  In order to do that, I first had to figure out which books belong on the list and which don't.  It might seem at first glance that that list would be cut-and-dried, but remember, there are several books outside of the series that are rather essential to the overall tale.  I always wondered, for example, how anyone who read Book VII without the benefit of having read Insomnia managed to have any grasp at all on what was going on with Patrick Danville.  But apparently, people did.

In any case, I've taken a stab at crafting a list of what any true Dark Tower fan needs to read in order to get the full benefit of the series, along with some justifications of why I've placed them in the order I've placed them in.

Let's get started. #1 seems obvious.

#1 -- The Dark Tower I: The Gunslinger (2004 revised edition)

I mean, really, where would you start other than at the beginning?

I was tempted to suggest that you begin with the original version, and then read the revised version at some later date, but as I was typing away attempting to justify that opinion, I realized it simply didn't hold up.  In fact, it wouldn't quite work if you read the series that way, because certain things in the original version contradict certain other things elsewhere in the series.  This, of course, was part of the reason why King revised the novel.

So it's really a no-brainer: start with the first novel in the series, and make sure it's the revised version.

By the way, there are apparently people who don't like The Gunslinger, and there are even people who recommend that you skip it altogether and begin by reading the second book in the series.

Those people are not to be heeded.  You HAVE to read The Gunslinger, and you have to read it first.  If you should find yourself not enjoying it very much, just stick with it.  It's relatively brief, and you'll be done with before you know it.  Then, move on the the second book, and if you get a hundred pages into it and still aren't enjoying it, then quit reading the series, because you will not enjoy anything that comes after it.

#2 -- The Dark Tower II: The Drawing of the Three

Like I said just a moment before, if you get more than about a hundred pages into The Drawing of the Three and aren't enjoying what you're reading, then I would recommend stopping right there.  Odds are, The Dark Tower -- and possibly Stephen King altogether -- are not for you.

Overall, this is one of the best books in the series, though, so I find it quite easy to recommend to people.

#3 -- The Stand (uncut edition)

Obviously, this novel is not part of the main series, and it was not evident that it was related to the series in any way until well over a decade later.

However, there is a character in the Tower series who also appears in this novel, and I think it's important that when he shows up in the main series, you already know who he is.  With that in mind, I think taking a break between books II and III makes for a good place to slot in The Stand, as well as the other King novel in which that character appeared before he began pestering Roland and company.

And yes, you should read the revised, uncut edition as opposed to the original edition.

#4 -- The Eyes of the Dragon

Without giving anything away in terms of who the character is who crosses over from The Stand, I can just say that he appears here also, and that you will figure it out the second he walks into The Eyes of the Dragon.  This is assuming that you don't already know, of course.

The Eyes of the Dragon is a nice, breezy little fantasy novel, and it makes for a decent shift in tone -- as well as in page count! -- from the dark epic that is The Stand.  Next up:

#5 -- The Talisman

Written in collaboration with Peter Straub, The Talisman is an epic fantasy novel that introduces a few concepts that would become fairly important to the overall Tower series, although it would not be apparent that they were important for many years after this book's publication. 

#6 -- The Dark Tower III: The Waste Lands

This is the favorite novel in the series for a lot of people, and I can see why: it's got a lot of great action, introduces a couple of major new characters, and is just generally awesome.

I'm sure a lot of people will be exasperated by the idea that I'm suggesting you read the first two novels in the series, then delay reading the third by first reading three novels that have only mild tangential connections.  Well, it's a valid response, but trust the Mahfah: he knows what you need.  And I think the sense of time's passage you will gain by taking a break between The Drawing of the Three and The Waste Lands will be of benefit to your enjoyment of the series.

#7 --The Dark Tower IV: Wizard and Glass

Apparently, some Dark Tower fans aren't wild about this book.  I may as well tell you new readers now, so that you'll know in advance: the vast majority of the book consists of a lengthy flashback to a tale from Roland's days as a youthful Gunslinger.  Personally, I find the insights you gain into his character to be indispensable; others seem to disagree, and while I see where they're coming from, I think they're dead wrong; this one of my absolute favorite books in the series.

#8 -- 'Salem's Lot

We now come to the point in the series where it becomes necessary to take an extended break. There are a number of books which are related to the series, several of which are absolutely essential, and all of which provide valuable insights into the concepts at work within the overall tale.

In my mind, it makes sense to take all of these in -- except for the three we dealt with earlier (those were important because they introduce a character who appears in Book III of the series, and also because of certain concepts in one that are mirrored in Book III) -- at once, and there are several reasons to do this.  The most important is that it preserves the experience of reading Books V, VI, and VII of the series as they really ought to be read: back-to-back-to-back.  However, there are also insights, characters, and concepts which appear in most of these ancillary books that will be of benefit to anyone reading books V-VII.

With that in mind, I'm recommending that people read all of these ancillary books more or less in the order they were published.

The first of those is 'Salem's Lot, which introduces a character who will become an important part of the final three books in the series.

#9 -- The Mist

The Mist is a novella which can most easily be found in the collection Skeleton Crew.  It has no explicit connections to the rest of the series, but anyone who has read it might have a better understanding of at least one scene from Book VII.
Plus, it's damn good, and not very long.

#10 -- It

I debated not putting this on the list, because -- like The Mist -- it has no explicit connections to the series.  However, there is an important scene toward the end of the novel that includes a character who ... well, that character doesn't appear in the series, but the idea of that character becomes crucially important during Book VI.
Additionally, it is possible that a certain character in Book VII is, in fact, a character from It.

This is a very, very long novel, but it's one well worth reading, and while its connections to the Tower series are somewhat brief, they are also important.

#11 -- Insomnia

Another long novel, but this one isn't as long as It, plus it is of vital importance to Book VII of the series.  At least two characters who are important to the series make their first appearances here, and in one scene, a character even has a dream about Roland!

This one is essential.

#12 -- Rose Madder

I may as well tell you: I'm not a fan of this novel.  However, it does feature some mild connections to The Dark Tower (specifically, to Book III), and some concepts that feature into the series.  Also, Stephen King includes it on his official list of books related to the main series.

Who am I to dispute Stephen King?

#13 -- Desperation

This novel has some major echoes in the Dark Tower novella "The Little Sisters of Eluria," and it also informs some of the concepts introduced in the final three books.

#14 -- The Regulators

This novel was published simultaneously with Desperation, and the two of them serve as Twinners of each other (that's a reference to The Talisman).  With that in mind, if you read Desperation you also need to read The Regulators; I tend to think of them as two volumes of the same book.  And yes, Desperation is Vol. 1, simply because that's the one King published under his own name.  (The Regulators was published under his "Richard Bachman" pseudonym.)

#15 -- "Everything's Eventual"

This is a short story, which can be found in the collection of the same name, Everything's Eventual.  The story introduces a character who will appear in Book VII.

#16 -- Bag of Bones

I debated leaving this one off the list, but, like Rose Madder, Stephen King says it belongs.

The connections to the series are tenuous, but they are there, and one character from Insomnia puts in a brief appearance. Plus, it's a good novel.

#17 -- "The Little Sisters of Eluria"

Michael Whelan's artwork from the anthology Legends

Well, this one is a no-brainer, because it's a novella about one of Roland's adventures.  It takes place before The Gunslinger, but after the flashback which comprises the bulk of Wizard and Glass.

It's good stuff, and elements of it are of minor importance in Book VI.

Plus, by now, you'll be very appreciative of spending a bit more time with Roland.  The novella can most easily be found in Everything's Eventual, but made its original appearance in a collection of novellas titled Legends.

#18 -- Hearts In Atlantis

One of the main characters in this strangely-structured -- but outstanding -- novel will be extremely important in Book VII.

#19 -- Black House

To say this novel -- which is a sequel to The Talisman -- is important to the overall series is an understatement of epic proportions.

#20 -- From a Buick 8

This is another one I would have omitted from the list if not for the fact that King included it on his.  Its connections are tangential at best.  However, it is a good novel, and relatively short, so you may as well give it a go.

#21 -- The Wind Through the Keyhole

This is an actual Dark Tower novel, so its inclusion is a must.  Chronologically, it takes place between Books IV and V, and I'm going to suggest that it be read immediately prior to Wolves of the Calla.

#22 -- The Dark Tower Book V: Wolves of the Calla

This begins the three-book finale.

#23 -- The Dark Tower VI: Song of Susannah

This middles the three-book finale.

#24 -- The Dark Tower VII: The Dark Tower

This concludes the three-book finale.  And a grand conclusion it is.

#25 -- The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger

I'm going to recommend that you conclude your journey by locating a copy of the original version of the first novel and giving it a look-see.  Perhaps not immediately, although reading it that way will certainly bring up interesting associations when read in conjunction with Book VII...


I omitted several titles from the list which I considered including.  These are:

The Tommyknockers:  This novel arguably has an interesting connection to The Talisman, but the connection is brief, and the novel is otherwise unrelated to the series.

Needful Things and Storm of the Century:  These books -- one of which (Storm) is a screenplay for the movie of the same name -- could theoretically be said to feature characters who (a) are the same character who appears in several other King novels, including several in the Tower series or (b) are related to that character.  However, the connections are not even implied; they are only possible if you choose to look at them in that way.  King has never said that they are, and really, until he does, there is no reason to include these two stories.

The Plant: Zenith Rising:  This serial novel is (a) not in print and (b) incomplete.  That's reason enough to leave it off.  The reason to put it on is that one character seems to be using a language that is used in certain part of the Tower series,but is most prominently used in Desperation.

Dreamcatcher:  The only connection here is that the novel is arguably set in the same reality as It.  That's not much of a connection.  Plus it's not a very good novel/

11/22/63:  King has said this book is not related to the Tower books, but I'm convinced that it is.  You should listen to Stephen King, but either way, you should read this novel, because it's a good one.

And, finally, I debated listing the Marvel Comics Dark Tower graphic novels at the end, but that opened up a can of worms that I'm not currently prepared to address.  Since they are not written by King, I feel fine in excluding them from this particular conversation.


I hope this was of some use to you!  Happy reading!

(And before I go, I'd like to throw in a plug for a post I wrote on one of my other blogs, The Steven Spielblog.  It's a Worst-to-Best ranking of all of the 'berg's films, and you can find it here if you're so inclined.)


  1. Well, not bad. The only thing I'd change is to good naturedly disagree on the ordering of Desperation and Regulators. I'm sorry, I'm just convinced the R should go before the D in this case.

    I believe you're right when you say it's a two part work, making it one of the few multi-part stories King has devoted to an essentially non-Tower character (i.e. Tak, and Pennywise didn't merit such treatment? What gives?)I just think that Regulators is part one and Desperation the finale. If I had to give justification for the ordering it would be this, the action sequences in Regulators act as a natural contrast to the more sedate tone and pace of Desperation.

    After non-stop opening action in the first act the audience will be ready to settle in and hear the rest of the story.

    I also believe Tak is the same character in both stories which brings me to my second point for order justification. If you look at Tak as the same character in both books, his actions in Desperation begin to make more sense, he's looking for Revenge.

    Still, that's just me.

    Going back the Tower novels. I got a confession to make. Having had a chance to pour over the revised gunslinger I have to say the new pacing and rhythm of the new edition strikes me, at least, as clunky compared to the 81.


    I will say though that I'm impressed that you managed to dig up so many King connections from just one film. I was only aware of Harris.

    I feel I should warn you, the film is by Alex Cox (director of Repo Man, with Harry Dean Stanton, hey I found a connection!) and the film is about the Nicuraguan 80s scandal and some footage from it is shown at the end. Just a heads up.

    One element "Walker" has with the Tower Mythos is the use of deliberate anachronisms and that I leave you to find out.


  2. Yeah, I'd imagine it works either way you read "Desperation" and "The Regulators."

    You know, I've never seen "Repo Man." Seems like I probably ought to have by now...

  3. I recently read the Fourth Edition of Rocky Wood's "Stephen King: Uncollected, Unpublished," and it reminded me of a few titles I omitted from the list and should not have. The most notable of these is undoubtedly the short story "Ur," which has Low Men as characters.

    Also worthy of mention: "Lisey's Story," in which a major character makes reference to Discordia, and the short story "The Reploids" which is arguably about the walk-in happenings which also appear in "Song of Susannah."

  4. Hmmm. after I am done rereading Cell and Lisey's Story (Next on my list) I might change the rest of the list to this list. Just because I am thrilled to read The Wind. I might read that first. Then buy the revised versions. Then go read it in this exact order. I have all these books (And more) so that shouldn't be a problem. ;) Thanks!

    1. Drop back by and let me know what you think of "The Wind Through the Keyhole" once you've read it, Daecca -- and thanks for reading!

  5. I definately will, Soon as I read it. wich will probably be right after Cell. I am in the middle of it right now. I will probably be finishing it when Wind will get out for the public here in hte NL.

  6. I wish I'd read this before starting my re-read!

  7. My wife and I are going to start reading these together and we are going to follow your list. Thanks for compiling it. I read the whole series a few years ago but I am compelled to read it all over again.

    1. Wow, that's awesome! By all means, drop back by and let me know how it goes.

    2. She is having trouble getting through book 2 but is determined to finish it. She really loved "It" and this series is just not living up to that book's complexity as of yet.

      For me, I finished book 2 and skipped The Stand (I really don't like that novel at all) and Eyes of the Dragon (love this one but read it not too long ago). So I moved on to The Talisman and I have to say that it is probably one of the worst books I have ever read. The last 150 pages of the book are atrociously bad with terrible writing (saying the word Talisman 7 times in a single paragraph) and other things I won't bother mentioning here. There were some good moments early on in the book, but those were squandered by the end.

    3. Yeah, I'm not a big fan of "The Talisman," either. I like the sequel, "Black House," a bit better.

  8. Thanks for this list; I've wanted to read Dark Tower since it finished but I never knew what other books I should read or in what order, and this clears it up a lot. I love long reading projects like this

    1. A decent number of the titles listed here are VERY incidental to the overall series, but I figured it was best to just create a complete list and let people make their own decisions as to how thorough they wanted to be.

      Have fun reading! ;)

    2. Thanks. The only King books I've read are The Stand, which I really liked and I've read three times, and The Tommyknockers, which was only so-so. Looking forward to reading some more of his (supposedly) better stuff.

  9. Great list! I've actually already embarked on your list (but I'm only on The Stand right now). I couldn't put The Gunslinger down!

    I was just wondering if you're going to keep this list updated as new books come out. And since your not writing this blog anymore and have another blog, how long will this stay on the net? Any plans to take the list down? That would be traumatic for me and my journey through the Dark Tower.

    I'm a late comer to Stephen King, but your list has definitely made me a huge fan!

    1. Wow, awesome! I'm definitely glad to hear you enjoyed "The Gunslinger"; that one isn't universally loved even among King fans, but it's one of my absolute favorites.

      I don't have any current plans to take the posts off the web from this incarnation of my blog. That might happen eventually, but not for now. In any case, I imported almost all of my posts here to my new blog, so here is a link to this post on that blog:

      I will DEFINITELY be updating the list when and if other books/stories appear. And boy oh boy, do I hope that happens...!

      Thanks for reading!

  10. Googled to find a reading order for The Dark Tower on a whim--I had planned on re-reading (again, for the nth time, this time including TWTTK in its proper spot) and was curious if there was an alternate order. This list is great! Especially since there are a few titles on here that I was itching to reread.

    1. Hey, thanks! I look forward to reading the whole sequence with TWTTK in sequence at some point, myself.

  11. Just curious, but why put The Stand before Eyes of the Dragon?

    1. It was written first, so my rationale is that that novel's version of Randall Flagg is forever the "real" Flagg. So my opinion is that one ought to be exposed to him that way first.

      But, then, I tend to place a greater emphasis on that sort of chronology (the chronology of composition) than some folks do.

  12. Nice work!!! The idea of reading the revised version of the gunslinger, and the original after reading the series is actually pretty good and adds to the idea of the ka as a wheel. One book I'd also add is the Night Shift stories collection, Night Surf serves as an epilogue to The Stand, while Jerusalem's Lot and One for the Road serve as prologue and epilogue respectively to Salem's Lot. It is not entirely necessary but they are nice reads... Another thing is, while I like the Uncut version of The stand a lot more than the original, for the chronology of the tower, the 1978 version would do better; it happens between 1980-1985, right before Wizard and Glass when they visit the plague world, whereas the uncut happens in the nineties which may confuse some people... but other than that, your reading order is almost the same as the order that I read the Tower :)

  13. I was 60% through 'The Waste Lands' when I started looking stuff up about The dark tower.. and when I found this page, I was like "Oh FUUUUuuhhh" then immediately jumped into 'The Stand' in all its insanely long uncut self!! Actually, this epic journey started whimsically with just wanting to get a bit of insight to the mc chris song 'Tony' from his new album Forrrever! An amazing song about The Shining, which is an appropriate addition to his ghost themed album. I loved the song instantly, even with only having experienced the Kubrick movie (shame on me I know), however I plowed through The Shining and still didn't understand one lyric from the song: "The Cook arrived just in time to lose all of his teeth. Wish I was a doctor instead of doc, I'd just rock him to sleep." And to my astonishment there had recently been a sequel to The Shining; Doctor Sleep, and I fervently read that to completion. After Doctor sleep I was looking though all of Mr. Kings Works not entirely sure where to start next, so I started reading the revised version of The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger, just very curious of how a western looking novel would end up scary and did not know the adventure and mind fuck I was in for. I admit, The Gunslinger was a bit slow at first, but compelled me through to the end, and is now easily one of my favorites. Then I was immediately drawn to the Drawing of Three (sorry for the pun). and absolutely could not put that down! I made my way on over to The Waste Lands and at this time my interest was peaked, I needed to know what I did not know. I looked up the proper order in which to read The Dark Tower series and found this treasure of a blog that was able to put into perspective what the Dark Tower actually was.. And oh my Gods, it is all encompassing!!! As I write this I am 66% through The Stand and still have two other books before I get to finish The Waste Lands, and I'm absolutely sure this is worth it. Major thanks to that honkmahfah: Bryant Burnette. Its sad to think there is an end to this seemingly endless journey, however it is that journey that I will absolutely relish.

    1. A few uneducated guesses I have at this point, Susannah and Mother Abigail are somehow related. Maybe I missed something or might be getting my facts wrong, but could Mother Abigail possibly be the "Blue Aunt"? And to further convolute this, might Mother Abigail be the "White Grandmother" Holloran spoke of whom coined the term "Shining"?
      Please tell me if there are actual connections or if I am just way off on this. I would love some perspective, and if I need to read more to get it I will accept that as well.

      Another half-assed thought: I have not read Eyes of The Dragon, merely a bit from the beginning and noticed a few things, probably not substantial.. again if I just need to read it to get it than so be it. Does Eyes of The Dragon take place WAYYyyy after The Stand in a time where it seems before modern times, however its just the World reforming after the events of the Super Flu? Again I have not finished either book, so it may be a bit early to make guesses like this. It just seems like if its closer to The Gunslinger and after The Stand than the names make a bit of sense, like maybe The Dark Tower Rolland could be named for a great king? And also Flagg is there, but then again when isn't O'dim.. err Flagg, or whoever he is! Again, please correct me if I am wrong.

      And just one more randomness that may full circle my thought: I don't think I saw The Shining on your list of required reading for the Dark Tower series; however, (I just realized this may be spoilerish so avert your eyes lest ye be spoiled) at the end of The Shining when the Overlook is burning and Danny.. or was it Holloran looks back and sees a cloud of smoke in the shape of a manta ray that appears to be flying away. This sounds similar to the demon that Detta has to uhh "subdue" in order to get you know who through the door in the sand.. I don't want to be too spoilerish (Bryant, you know what I'm talking about.. right?) could The Shining be more connected than we think.. Especially with Mother Abigail saying in The Stand people with the gift have the "Shining Grace of God" eh eh, The Shining!? ok this is long enough, I'm done..

      Again, amazing blog ya got here. I'm sure anyone who starts up the Dark Tower will inevitably and assuredly find their way over here.

    2. First of all, John, thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated!

      Second, I love the idea of somebody accidentally becoming a Stephen King fan by being an mc chris fan. That cracks me up, because I had a very similar experience, but with Steven Spielberg and Arnold Schwarzenegger rather than mc chris. I'll have to go find that "Tony" song and give it a listen.

      I'm glad you ended up enjoying "The Gunslinger." I love that novel, and can't imagine the series without it.

      To answer your questions:

      (1) Unless I missed it, there is no direct evidence to indicate that Susannah and Mother Abagail are related. But who knows? They could be. I'd love to see a crossover just to see what Abagail would have to say to Odetta!

      (2) The idea of Abagail being Dick's "white grandmother" is fascinating. It seems unlikely, but again, it's a possibility of sorts. (It can't literally be true, I guess, since "Doctor Sleep" clearly takes place in a world that has not been ravaged by a superflu. But it could theoretically be a parallel universe in which Abagail lived out her life to its natural end. Which sounds like something a crazy person would say, but hey, "The Dark Tower" accommodates ideas like that one. Quite well, in fact!)

      (3) "The Eyes of the Dragon" -- If I've got it all straight, this novel SEEMS to take place in more or less the same world as "The Gunslinger," but in a different region. And this appears to also be the same case with parts of "The Talisman," by the way. So...the question is, where/what/when is this world in relation to our world (by which I mean the world -- or worlds, if you prefer -- in which most of King's work is set)? There's no definitive answer to that, but my take on it is that "The Gunslinger" takes place in a version of our world that is very far in the future, long after a massive catastrophe of some sort. As for "The Stand," I think -- but do not by any means know for sure -- that it takes place in a parallel universe.

      (4) That's a great catch on the similarity between what Dick sees at the end of "The Shining" and Susannah's unwanted boyfriend in "The Waste Lands." I'd never noticed that before! I think you're definitely onto something, and you could be right that "The Shining" is more connected than it at first might seem.

      Then again, a great many of King's novel and stories can be connected to "The Dark Tower" in one way or another; there are very few which can't, in fact. That's part of the fun of being a King fan, no doubt about it!

      I'm glad you found my post. It's pretty wild (and cool) that something I wrote two and a half years ago is still getting discovered by people. But that's why I wrote it: I thought it might theoretically be of use to people, and hey, whattaya know? It has been!

      By the way, I later ended up migrating everything on this blog over to a different one, which is still very much active and which can be found here:

      That blog's version of this post ( has some awesome contributions in the comments section from a reader named Dan who has been posting reactions and observations along the way during his read-throughs. Well worth having a look at, although you should beware spoilers for certain books.

      Anyways, have a look if you want. And enjoy the rest of your trip through the books!

  14. Nice, that's a big help but I really think you should have listed the excellent Prequel Graphic Novels.

    1. King didn't write those, so I don't consider them to be part of his universe; they are part of someone else's.

    2. For the record, Stephen King did oversee and approve the comics, specifically Robin Furth's plotting, at least thru Jericho Hill. Given that the comics are the only documentation we have of what happened to Roland's ka-tet between Mejis and Jericho Hill along with King's stamp of approval, I think we can basically accept them as DT canon. Having said that, to repeat what you've said yourself, each reader can decide for themselves how deep down the rabbit hole they want to go, haha. Great list.

    3. And after posting the above, I just saw your exhaustive, as in comprehensive, post on your definition of canon, haha.

    4. The only specific thing I've seen about King's level of involvement with the comics comes from an interview he gave for Bev Vincent's book "The Dark Tower Companion." Vincent asks him point-blank to what extent he is involved with the comics, and here is what King says:

      "I monitored them really closely at the beginning. I wanted to make sure everything was on track and going the right way. I know Robin [Furth] does a really great job. After they went off on their own, I didn't want to junk up my head with their story lines. That's Robin's take on all this, and she's fine with it and she can do whatever she wants because I'm more or less done. I've got this one book coming out, 'The Wind Through the Keyhole,' and there might be more after that, but if there are, they won't be influenced at all by whatever's going on in the comics and indeed might run contradictory to what's in the comics. You know what Roland says: There are other worlds than these."

      So in other words, King stopped reading the comics relatively early in the process.

      I maintain that the comics might be SOMEBODY'S Dark Tower, but they are mostly not King's. As such, I can't accept them as the "real" story (for whatever that matters, i.e. not much to anybody other than me).

  15. This is an excellent list, I love the information you provided and the suggested order is great, for some reason though King is one of my favorite authors there are many books on this list I haven't read! The ones I have were read years before I got my hands on the Dark tower series so their connections though vaguely familiar weren't as apparent as they could have been. I just have to say that though I have read the series twice, you have convinced me to start rereading them now, including all of the books you suggested! I'm just worried about It, as I tried to read that when I was younger and that was a bad idea. But I'm an adult I should be alright this time haha. Thanks.

    1. Thankee sai!

      I hope you enjoy your reading -- feel free to stop by here and keep us updated. Or, better yet, stop my the same post at a newer blog of mine:

      Either way, I appreciate the kind words!

  16. Thanks so much for the hard work and critical consideration that went into this. I've been going through the core DT books straight through Wolves, being unaware of the adjacent reading until mention of the low men in Callahan's backstory, and the quasi-self promotion for Salem's Lot in the cave at the end. So, at this point, do you think it's worth pausing to do some fill-in? Or, keep momentum and complete the core series (DT6 next?) and go back to stuff The Stand, Eyes of the Dragon, and even DT 4.5 (which I didn't know existed)? Curious to get your opinion and eager to keep reading! Thanks in advance!

    1. Hmm. That's a good question. I think I'd say go ahead and finish, since you've come that far. You MIGHT want to consider reading "Insomnia" before DT7; but 5-7 are so close to being a single, sustained narrative that I'd be reluctant to recommend that you break it up.

      So I think I say keep on reading the series itself.


    2. Thank you! Sounds like a plan :)

  17. Thankee Sai for this list, I just finished the last book in the series, and while I relished the journey, it was not without major hurdles. I started reading the first book last summer, using your list as a guide and I have to say that some of the minor books could be deal breakers for many people. The fairly absymal quality of books like Desperation/Regulators or The Talisman, nearly made me quit the path of the beam, if it hadn't been for the Tower, I would have given up. So allow me to suggest a slightly shorter version of your list, to avoid discouragement. I'm personally a completist and I went through with all of them, but I can safely say that some are incredibly trivial to the overall understanding of the main Tower books.

    Here are the ones I would say you can absolutely live without:

    Eyes of the Dragon: I actually liked this one a lot, but the book really doesn't feel like it's in the same world as Roland's, and the Flagg from that book is extremely different from the Flagg from The Stand or the Dark Tower series.

    The Mist: Again, great King short story, but the connections are pretty trivial.

    Rose Madder: The connections are almost non-existent and it's a pretty mediocre book.

    Desperation: I absolutely hated that book, it's uninspired and ugly. The connections to the Tower are small and I don't think they are enough to warrant suffering through this one.

    Regulators: Not as bad as Desperation, but pretty close. Until those books I was pretty much reading the books at a fast and steady pace (well not The Talisman, but I'll come to that later). It took me forever to get through these, I'm talking months.

    Bag of Bones: Very skippable, but it's a good book.

    From a Buick 8: Highly skippable as well, it wasn't bad, but it's very repetitive and it took me a long time to read even though it's quite short.

    Now, I want to talk about books that have a higher significance to the series, but that I personally hated and I think they can also slow your journey to a screetching halt.

    The Talisman: The writing is really bad, Straub and King seem to cancel each other out, it's also one of the most bloated books I've ever read. About a third of it is compelling, the rest is tedious at best. On top of that, I think it's almost like a kids version of the Dark Tower journey. The only fantastic section is the Sunlight Gardener's School part.

    Black House: Not nearly as bad as the Talisman and it is connected to the tower, however I feel like you don't really need to read these to appreciate the series as a whole. I know some might disagree, but I think the books are just not good enough to warrant the waste of time.

    The rest of the books are pretty vital, I would say It, could be skipped, but it's such a great book and at least one element is of high importance.

    I would also like to suggest an addition, based on something that happens in the last three books, I think King's non-fiction book, On Writing, would maybe make a certain element more palatable and understandable. I'm actually pretty sure, it might be the only reason I didn't throw Song of Susannah in the trash. I wonder what you think of that suggestion, Mr. Burnette?

    Also, as a palate cleanser after the final book, I would suggest reading the short story, Ur (2009), it's quite short and it's got some nice tie-ins to the main books.

    1. That's actually a very interesting suggestion. I'll have to give it some thought; there's no doubt that being familiar with it would be an aid to the Towerphile. Enough to warrant inclusion on this list? I don't know, but it's certainly worth considering.

      We are pretty much in agreement concerning "The Talisman." I get what they were going for, but I don't think they succeeded. Not for my tastes, at least; but I did love that novel at one point in time, and its fans are many and rabid. So maybe this is a case of us being wrong and everyone else being right.


      I do like your suggestion of creating an alternate version of this list that is significantly pruned back. A task for some other day! And yes, "Ur" would make a good addition to it.

      I'm glad to hear you (more or less) enjoyed your trek through the books!

    2. WARNING!! I'm not really going to spoiler anything here, but you should not read this if you haven't finished the books.

      About On Writing, I'm thinking specifically about the chapter where King describes his accident, without going into details about how this is important for the last three books, I think that the intimate knowledge of how that affected King's life and his writing is vastly important. I know most people are vaguely familiar with the fact that King was hit by a car, but On Writing gives you a very in depth account.

      At least three people involved with his accident are characters in book 7. My reading of On Writing fed the last two books as much, if not more, than many of the crucial ones on this list. On top of that, On Writing serves as part autobiography, with many events and annecdotes coming up in the last two books. Some which he basically riffs on. I think you might not realize how important it is, because you are an expert on King. I assume you read countless interviews and articles about him throughout the years, and you probably knew many of the stories from On Writing when you first read it. I think many readers who will come accross your list (for which I am very grateful, I probably didn't make that clear enough) do not have any real knowledge of King as a person, or his journey as a writer. I also think there is a similarity in tone, especially the self-deprecating aspect. The two accounts echo each other, and the fiction king is almost a twinner of non-fiction King.

      I'm aware that many people love The Talisman, for mysterious reasons. My mother is actually a King fan, and we made this journey together, following your list that I sent her. We had very similar feelings on The Talisman/Black House, I think she described going through those, and Regulators/Desperation, as "homework".

      I did enjoy the journey (more than less), I especially loved the first four books in the series, It (which I had read many years ago), Salem's Lot, and Hearts in Atlantis. I always hated the last part of The Stand, to the point that I avoided King for years based on the disappointment. I've learned to understand that King is generally bad at endings, and I accept it because the pros outways the cons, and he sometimes manages to wrap things up quite nicely.

      My very favorite from this whole adventure, was Wizard and Glass, I find it funny that many dislike it, usually on the grounds that it doesn't move the story closer to the tower. But isn't it all about the journey anyway?

      I did find the last three books uneven and rushed, I think part of King just wanted the weight of the series to be off his shoulders, and it shows. I kind of wish he had sat on those a little longer, as there are many times where they feel like early drafts in desperate need of rethinking and editing. There are still many great moments in the last books, and I'm not one of those who think they are absolute disasters, but they certainly don't live up to the first four. Still it's a massive undertaking, that should earn most readers respect, and as King says “I never worked harder on a project in my life, and I know—none better, alas—that it has not been entirely successful. What work of make-believe ever is?”

      I think with age, I'm more accepting of imperfections in a body of work, I know how hard it is to write anything compelling, let alone four fantastic books like the first in the series. I'm definitely far from disheartened with King as a writer, and I'm looking forward to reading some of his other classics, that I've yet to read.

    3. We're on pretty much the same page with all of that, I'd say, although it sounds like my tolerance for the final three books in general (and "Song of Susannah" in particular) is stronger than yours.

      You make some great points about "On Writing," and I suspect you are 100% correct about my knowledge on the subject causing me to undervalue that book's usefulness somewhat. (Caveat: I would absolutely NOT consider myself a King expert. I've got an above-average knowledge of the subject, no doubt; but expert level? Not in my opinion.)

      That's massively cool that you and your mom went on that reading journey together!

      Agreed about "The Stand." I think the novel's good points vastly outweigh the bad, but I'm with you; the ending just doesn't work for me. I get what he was going for; but it just didn't work. Maybe that epigraph about the world ending not with a bang but a whimper applies equally to the novel. Although, to be fair, I do love everything post-explosion, so it's not ALL bad news.

      I also totally agree about "Wizard and Glass." It's not my favorite in the series (that's "The Gunslinger"), but I love the first four books so much that there's really very little point in ranking them.

      "I think with age, I'm more accepting of imperfections in a body of work, I know how hard it is to write anything compelling, let alone four fantastic books like the first in the series. I'm definitely far from disheartened with King as a writer, and I'm looking forward to reading some of his other classics, that I've yet to read." -- That's a great attitude, and it's close to my own. King certainly isn't perfect, and I think he'd be the last one to claim to be. But when you consider his body of work as a whole thing, good lord, what a titanic amount of entertainment there is to be had there.

  18. I found this list about a year and a half ago, and I just finished the series today. This list was a perfect way to dive into the Dark Tower and was an awesome journey through other semi-standalone Stephen King books, my favorites including It, Bag of Bones, and From a Buick 8. Thanks for the great list so that I could make sense of all the complexities and not have to worry about if I was missing anything!

    1. You are more than welcome! I had a lot of fun writing it, so the fact that it has seemingly been of use to people is just icing on the cake. Pretty good icing, though!

  19. Despite the claims that Maturin is named after Stephen Maturin of the Aubrey/Maturin books, I've added Melmoth the Wanderer by Charles Robert Maturin to my version of your reading list. Melmoth feels RF-ish...

  20. Despite the claims that Maturin is named after Stephen Maturin of the Aubrey/Maturin books, I've added Melmoth the Wanderer by Charles Robert Maturin to my version of your reading list. Melmoth feels RF-ish...